Justice Tijjani Ringim of a Lagos Federal High Court, has struck out a fundamental rights enforcement suit, filed by a businessman, Emeka Solomon Nwadiogbu, against the Assistant Inspector-General of Police (AIG) in-charge of Interpol and Mr. Martins Nwogoh, a Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP).
Another beneficiary of the court’s judgment is Momoh Christopher, who is the third respondent in the suit.
Justice Ringim struck out the suit over the failure of the businessman to join the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) in the suit?
The applicant who is the promoter of Emilinks Limited, through his lawyer, Eubena Amedu, had dragged the police officers and Mr. Momoh Christopher, before the court on alleged breached of his fundamental rights, in a suit marked FHC/L/CS/234/2022.
He therefore asked for the followings; “A declaration that the invitation of the applicant by the first and second respondents at the behest of the third respondent over a purely civil dispute and for the purposes of helping the said third respondent to recover money allegedly owed him by the Applicant, is illegal, unconstitutional, null, void and constitutes gross violation of applicant’s fundamental rights as enshrined in Sections 34(1) (a) and 35 of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended: Articles 2, 5 and 6 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap 10, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990.
“A declaration that the first and second respondents not being a court within the meaning of Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended cannot adjudicate on any civil dispute and/or any dispute between the Applicant and the third respondent.
“An order of the court restraining the first and second respondents jointly and severally or whether by the first respondent itself, its officers, agents, servants, privies or acting through any persons howsoever, including the second respondent, from further inviting, harassing, humiliating, embarrassing, threatening to arrest and detain or arresting and/or detaining the Applicant based on a baseless, false and unfounded allegation contained in a petition lodged by the third respondent
“An Order of the court restraining the respondents from disturbing or further disturbing, interfering or further interfering, disrupting or further disrupting the businesses of the Applicant.
“N50 million, as exemplary damages against the respondents jointly and severally for the harassment, constant threat and disruption of the business of Emilinks Limited, by touts regularly sent to Emilinks Limited by the third respondent.”
But the two police officers in their 28 paragraphs counter affidavit filed by their lawyer, Barrister Morufu A. Animashaun, a legal officer at the Force Criminal Investigation Department (ForceCID) Annex, Alagbon-Ikoyi Lagos, had urged the court to dismiss the application for being frivolous, incomplete and lacking in merit.
Animashaun while denied almost all the aveerments in the applicant’s affidavit, told the court that there was never a time the applicant was threatened or maltreated. Adding that the applicant was only invited over the petition written against him.
Animashaun also added that by the power of Section 4 of Police Act and other authorities, the Nigeria Police and it’s agents have rights to investigate any petition and invites anyone for investigation on the the allegations contained in the petition.
In the same vein, lawyer to the third respondent, Fidelis I. Akra, in his submission before the court stated that the suit that omitted the Nigerian Police Force (NPF) as a party, and being the parent of the agents, first and second respondents, is a non-starter and liable to be dismissed.
Delivering judgment on suit, Justice Ringim held that: “since the competence of the Originating Motion is in issue, I feel obliged to give this issue the priority it deserves lest I assume jurisdiction to try this matter in vain.
“While the argument of the 3rd respondent’s Counsel was clearly on point as to whether the absence of the Nigerian Police Force (NPF) as a Party makes the instant case liable to dismissal; the counter argument of the Learned Counsel to the applicant is obscure as to which of the Party is an agent and of whom and to what extent did the said agent exceeds his authority and in what form and manner and to what extent do the Reliefs 1-4 affect the said agent.
“In my humble view, what appears to me in issue was whether the instant suit can subsist without the NPF being made a Party.
“The law is trite that in any action against police officers in their official capacity, the NPF, as a statutory body and who will be vicariously liable for its operatives’ action, is a necessary party whose joinder is non-negotiable and the absence of whom renders an action incompetent and liable to be struck out…..
“In this instant case, and within the context of the reliefs 1-5 which the applicant sought against the first and second respondents, the NPF, i.e. the first and second respondents’ statutory principal, will obviously be vicariously liable since the first and second respondents appeared to have been sued in their official capacity. The absence of the NPF, a necessary Party, makes the instant action incompetent and this i so hold.
“This action is accordingly struck out for its incompetence. This is my Judgment”.
…….
For Advertisement, Event Coverage, Public Relations, Story/Article Publication, and other Media Services, kindly send an email to: thelegendnews25@gmail.com. To stay updated with the latest news, health updates, happenings,Sports and interesting stories, visit thelegendnewsng.com . THE OBINJA MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS (Publisher of TheLegendNews/THELEGENDTV)
